Heidegger, Cassirer, Davos, centers on this debate between these two philosophical adversaries. In his book Gordon examines the background of the debate. Heidegger and/or Cassirer at Davos. GEOFFREY WAITE. Cornell University. There was a famous discussion between Heidegger and Ernst Cassirer in Davos . In Ernst Cassirer and Martin Heidegger participated in a momentous debate in Heidegger, Cassirer, Davos, centers on this debate between these two.
|Published (Last):||28 March 2011|
|PDF File Size:||11.2 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||15.63 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Existential modes of philosophizing due to Kierkegaard and Nietzsche were at the same time making themselves increasingly felt; philosophical anthropology pointed philosophy in a new direction; and finally there was Edmund Husserl and his school.
But it was also a moment at which German nationalism was taking a new ugly turn and the ever-present anti-Semitism was becoming caswirer virulent.
Continental Divide: Heidegger, Cassirer, Davos – Wikipedia
Having given a broad first outline of Cassirer’s and Heifegger respective positions, he proceeds in his first chapter to analyze the situation of German philosophy at the time of the Davos encounter.
Fruitless as it was in the end for the two antagonists, the debate in fact stirred from the start an unusually wide interest. Heidegger, Cassirer, Davosdeals directly with this encounter — with its content, its setting, its antecedents, consequences, and implications.
Rosenzweig died in late before the Nazis gained power and Cassirer himself was forced to seek refuge in England, Sweden, and finally the United States, where czssirer died as a professor at Yale University injust as the Nazi terror was reaching an end. Thus, Cassirer’s historical narratives committed him to some kind of recognition of human finitude while Heidegger’s preoccupation with the possibility of making authentic choices led him in to celebrate the “will to power” of Germany’s Nazi youth.
What is human finitude? Gordon’s book presents us with a paradigm of what intellectual history should look like. As Gordon explains, the Davos debate would continue to both inspire and provoke well after the two men had gone their separate ways.
Over the last eighty years the Davos encounter has acquired an allegorical significance, as if it heidevger an ultimate and irreparable rupture in twentieth-century Continental thought. Our recent titles are available via Edelweiss.
Heidegger, Cassirer, Davos | Perverse Egalitarianism
Their disagreement can be understood only if we appreciate their common point of departure as thinkers of the German interwar crisis, an era of rebellion that touched all of the major philosophical movements of the day—life-philosophy, philosophical anthropology, neo-Kantianism, phenomenology, and existentialism.
The deeper tragedy is that it ended heideggeg politics at all. Comparative and Continental Philosophy. In Gordon’s final judgment, “the ultimate tragedy of the Davos encounter is not that it ended in victory for politics heidsgger the wrong kind.
The book can usefully be read as a sequel to Gordon’s earlier work, for the two books together draw an extraordinary picture of a unique moment in the history of twentieth-century German philosophy and culture. Edward Cassirr is an apt character to think about at Christmas-time.
Heidegger agreed that “In this question of the going-beyond of finitude, there lies a quite central problem.
Here, dwvos a reconstruction at once historical and philosophical, Peter Gordon reexamines the conversation, its origins and its aftermath, resuscitating an event that has become entombed in its own mythology. Gordon reconstructs the debate between Heidegger and Cassirer, demonstrating its significance as a point of rupture in Continental thought that implicated all the major philosophical movements of the day. Over the last eighty years the Davos encounter has acquired an allegorical significance, as if it marked an ultimate and irreparable rupture in twentieth-century Continental thought.
Subscribe to receive information about forthcoming books, seasonal catalogs, and more, in newsletters tailored to your interests. Leave a Reply Cancel reply Enter your comment here Neo-Kantianism had dominated the German heidegfer scene for two generations or more, but by the s deep divisions were becoming evident in this school of thought.
But Gordon also shows how the life and work of these two philosophers remained closely intertwined. Heidegger’s Being and Time, which had put him at the center of German philosophy inreadily incorporated all these new forces.
Soon the fertile German-Jewish symbiosis was to come to an end. Through a close and painstaking analysis, Gordon cassirr the exchange itself to reveal that it was at core davps philosophical disagreement over what it means to be human.
Gordon dissects the content of that debate in his fourth and longest chapter in a rich and skillful analysis. Clearly, but if Heidegger was wearing one of vassirer ski outfits it may have been a different story.
Cassirer argues that while Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason emphasizes human temporality and finitude, he also sought to situate human cognition within a broader conception of humanity.
Through a close and painstaking analysis, Gordon dissects the exchange itself to reveal that it was at core a philosophical disagreement over what it means to be human.
cadsirer Heidegger, Cassirer, Davos review “. InPeter Gordon, Professor of History at Harvard University, published a remarkable book on the kinship between two distinctive figures of Weimar culture: You are commenting using your WordPress. Gordon’s second chapter describes the setting of Cassirer’s and Heidegger’s debate.
You are commenting using your Facebook account.
His nonsense books, mo …. In his last chapter, Gordon reviews the mythology that has grown up around the event.
The opposition of freedom and finitude nevertheless serves Gordon well for framing his narrative of the Davos debate. For philosophical readers, Continental Divide as well as Gordon’s earlier book are likely to prove of interest primarily because cxssirer what they say about Heidgger, his thought, his life, and his times.
The Cassirer—Heidegger debate is an encounter between Martin Heidegger and Ernst Cassirer in March in DavosSwitzerland  concerning the significance of Kantian notions of freedom and rationality. To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: