Petrov Defense (1 e4 e5 2 Nf3 Nf6): chess opening performance statistics, strategy and tactics, famous games, PGN download, discussion forum, and more. DEFENSA PETROV 1 [Artur Yusupov] on *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. Defensa Petrov. Front Cover. Artur Yusupov. Ajedrez Internacional QR code for Defensa Petrov. Title, Defensa Petrov Colección internacional de ajedrez.
|Published (Last):||1 May 2013|
|PDF File Size:||2.28 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||17.28 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Nc4, the Paulsen Variationis labelled “ineffective” by de Firmian in MCObut is occasionally seen at grandmaster level. Nc6, it transposes to the Two Knights Defence. Another possibility, explored by Keresis 5. Retrieved 29 January Just being like “F it” and going for it immediately has a strong psychological effect, because most opponents are like “dang, I would never dare to do that”, especially in a tournament.
Be2 is better for White 5. My friend mistakenly believed it to be an unsound variation because there’s a trap in it, but if you play it properly it’s actually a recognized line.
This is generally only good enough for a drawwhich Black should be satisfied with. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language. But if you jsut want the sort of position you tend to get from it then fine, its playable.
Bc4 is the Italian Variation of Petrov’s Defence. Re1, Black can force draw by 8. C Stanley vs J S Turner. The old method with 5.
It is not so extreme as you say. I’ve been looking to see if there’s a knock-down theoretical refutation, and I don’t see one. Im fairly good at accurate calculation, so I actually win a lot as black in the petroff. No posting personal information of members.
That seems to miss the point, pdtrov idea is supposed to be that you get compensation in the form of development, initiative, attack, or positional features, in exchange for giving up some wood. Bishop and knight checkmate King and pawn vs king Opposite-coloured bishops Pawnless endgame Queen and pawn vs queen Queen vs pawn Rook and bishop vs rook Rook and pawn vs rook Lucena position Philidor position Strategy fortress opposition Tarrasch rule triangulation Zugzwang Study Tablebase Two knights endgame Wrong bishop Wrong rook pawn.
If they can’t get back the pawn with equality, they say the gambit is “unsound”.
Nc3 leading to the following position: Bd3, where he will try to drive Black’s advanced knight from e4 with moves like c4 and Re1. In practice White is usually able to achieve this, but at some structural cost such as having to play c4, which balances out. It is also petrog by Views Read Edit View history.
I beat him in that line five or six times in a row, and then told him it had been sound all along. Also possible is Old as the opening is, the 5. Sefensa of the Day Petrov Defense 1. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Pillsbury’s game in  against Emanuel Lasker testifies to this. Occasionally seen is the quiet 3.
Defensa Petrov – Viquipèdia, l’enciclopèdia lliure
Black players don’t want it to be sound because it would ruin the Petrov if people started playing it all the time. I’m guessing Topa had winning lines worked out at home, but ultimately was surprised by Kramnik giving up material to establish a perpetual check, along the first rank and g3 square. Here’s an interesting game I played against the Petroff: If you already have an account, you should login eptrov.
List of openings theory table List of chess gambits Irregular Quick checkmates Fool’s mate Scholar’s mate. Pillsbury,0—1 Chessgames.
Nxe4 d5 gives Black the bishop pair and control of the centre. Though this symmetrical response has a long history, it was first popularised by Alexander Petrova Russian chess player of the midth century.
Black can capture either white pawn.
Topalov vs Kramnik,