Site Loader

QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY. Elements of Psychophysics, Volume I. By Gustav Fechner. Translated by Helmut E. Adler. Elements of Psychophysics, Volume 1. Front Cover. Gustav Theodor Fechner. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, QR code for Elements of Psychophysics. Download Citation on ResearchGate | Elements of psychophysics. Vol. Contains historical introductions on the life of Fechner by E. G. Boring and by H. E. Adler.

Author: Tojalmaran Akizilkree
Country: Egypt
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Medical
Published (Last): 13 March 2008
Pages: 468
PDF File Size: 4.60 Mb
ePub File Size: 3.8 Mb
ISBN: 540-6-98548-871-1
Downloads: 81604
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Tojinn

Green York University, Toronto, Ontario. When the number 10 is increased by 10, that is, reaches 20the logarithm corresponding to 10, which is 1, is increased to 1.

This insight proved to be significant in the development of psychology as there was leements a quantitative relationship between the mental and physical worlds.

Gustav Fechner

Fechner’s work in or is also important. In each instance the increase in the logarithm is 0. There is, however, another formula connected with this formula by infinitesimal calculus, which expresses a general quantitative relation between the stimulus magnitude as a summation of stimulus increments, and the sensation magnitude as fecnher summation of sensation increments, in such a way, that with the validity of the first formula, together with the assumption of the fact of limen, the validity of this latter formula is also given.

In fact they may eleents invalid as soon as the fechber hypotheses for which they are true no longer exist. However, there has been some ongoing dispute on the experiment itself, as the fact that Fechner deliberately discarded results of the study ill-fitting to his needs became known, with many mathematicians including Mario Livio refuting the result of elemeents experiment. Each year, psychophysicists celebrate 22 October as the anniversary of Fechner’s new insight as Fechner Day.

He starts from the monistic thought that bodily facts and conscious facts, though not reducible one to the other, are different sides of one reality. One can readily see, that the relation between the increments d g ekements d b in the fundamental formula corresponds to the relation between the increments of a logarithm and the increments of the corresponding number. If now, as was shown above, the increase of sensation and stimulus stands in a relation similar to that of the increase of logarithm and number, and, the point at which the sensation begins to assume a noticeable value stands in a relation to the stimulus similar to that which the point at which the logarithm attains positive value stands to the number, then one may also expect that sensation and stimulus themselves stand in a relation to one another similar to that of logarithm to number, which, just as the former sensation elemenst stimulus may be regarded as made up of a sum of successive increments.


Meanwhile it is not the most general formula that can be derived, but one which is only valid under the supposition of particular units of sensation and stimulus, and we still need a direct and absolute deduction instead of the indirect and approximate one.

This is the mathematical principle. In fact, if one psycgophysics b d and b by any number, so long as it is the same number for both, the proportion remains constant, and with it also the sensation difference d g. University of Pittsburgh Press.

Gustav Theodor Fechner and his Psychophysical Worldview. Elements of PsychophysicsVolume 1. The page numbers included her are from the Rand edition. We will return to this statement in a special chapter chapter 18 since it is of great importance, and perhaps not directly evident to everyone.

A History of Modern Psychology. In order to do this, the relation of the inner process to the stimulus must be known. Now as to Weber’s law. Fechner speculated that if the corpus callosum were splittwo separate streams of consciousness would result – the mind would become two. Inasmuch as this is not a matter of direct experience it must be deduced by some exact method. or

In the former case, when the sensation reaches its lower threshold; in the latter case, when it becomes so great that a given stimulus increase is barely noticed.

Inquiries into Human Faculty and Its Development.

In the case of Kepler’s law we abstract from deviations. Stevens proposed the more mathematically plausible power-law relation of sensation to intensity in his famous paper entitled “To Honor Fechner and Repeal His Law. Yet they will always remain [p. Fechner’s reasoning has been criticized on the grounds that although stimuli are composite, sensations are not.


Adler Snippet view – The sensation begins with values above zero, not with zero, but with a finite value of the stimulus — the threshold; and so does the logarithm begin with values above zero, not with a zero value of the number, but with a finite value of the number, the value I, inasmuch as the logarithm of 1 is equal to zero.

Yet, Fechner believed that fehner theory would never be tested; he was incorrect.

The study of medicine also contributed to a loss of religious faith and to becoming atheist. De verwarring der zintuigen. Little is known of Fechner’s later years, nor of the circumstances, cause, and manner of his death.

Classics in the History of Psychology — Fechner (/)

Weber’s law, that equal relative increments of stimuli are proportional to equal increments of sensation, is, in consideration of its generality and the wide limits within which it is absolutely or approximately valid, to be considered fundamental for psychic measurement. In Fechner published a paper in which he developed the notion of the median. He conducted experiments to show that certain abstract forms and proportions are naturally pleasing to our senses, and gave some new illustrations of the working of aesthetic association.

Accordingly investigation in the interest of the greatest possible generalization of psychic measurement has not essentially to commence with the greatest possible generalization of Weber’s law, which might easily produce the questionable inclination to generalize the law beyond its natural limitation, or which might call forth the objection that the law was generalized beyond these limits solely in the interest of psychic measurement; but rather it may quite freely be asked haw far Weber’s law is applicable, and how far not; for the three methods which are used in psychic measurement are applicable even when Weber’s law is not, and where these methods are applicable psychic measurement is possible.